Conversation

November 28, 2011

Conversation with arborist Kelly:

K:  You should draw a smiley face on that big log in the middle of your woodpile.

Me:  You think?  I don’t know.  Last year I put numbers on some of the wood, to help estimate how long it would last.   People made fun of me.

K:  You put numbers on your wood?  Are you a Virgo?

Me:  Wow.  Good guess.

K:  I knew you were a Virgo as soon as I saw your wood pile.

Me:  What?!  Come on.  That is a totally substandard wood pile.  That is not at all up to Virgo standards.  I mean, the whole tower on the right side is leaning over.

K:  See?  That’s the sort of comment that shows you’re a Virgo.

Treemagedon

November 19, 2011

Project Norway Maple Eradication (aka Treemagedon) has begun!  My “back 40″ (or more accurately, back 0.2) is chock full of Norways, and they are doing their best to take over the front 40, too.  And the neighbors yards, and the garden, and the rest of the world.  Ever since I bought the house, I’ve been scheming their demise– yesterday, the work began.

Arborist Kelly Palomera (who doesn’t have a website, or I’d send you to her) came with ropes and spikes and stuff, and friend Frank (aka icerabbit) very generously spent the whole day here working too (with his own chainsaw!)  The destruction proceeded at a pretty good clip, and we got about half of the trees down, limbed, and logged by sunset.  More work next weekend.

Next year’s firewood piling up!  I plan to replant the area with native hardwoods– sugar maple, red maple, or both.

Peripheral Central Heat

November 15, 2011

I love how with Google you can type in half a question, and see what via the “suggestions” what the most common related questions are.  For example, if you type in “Why are radiators”, you will see that although many people want to know why radiators are black (or white), and many want to know why radiators make noise, the #1 thing that puzzles people about radiators is: Why are they under windows?

It is indeed a good question.  Maybe your radiators aren’t under your windows.  But if you live in an older house, there’s a good chance they are.  As a dramatic example, is the living room of my friends’ S. & J.’s previous home in Portland (used without permission, because it’s past their bedtime):If you said, “But those radiators are just pouring heat out the windows!”, you’d probably be right.  So why put them there?  This is my hypothesis:  central heating was new and exciting, and for the first time it was possible to design a house so that every room, and indeed every part of every room, was virtually the same temperature.  I suspect people idealized a home where you could drift from cupboard to dining table to sofa to window-seat and not feel a “chill”.  To achieve that, to really even out the heat, the best place to put the heat source was right in coldest place– which, before the days of weatherstripping and triple-glazing,  was bound to be close to the windows.

This worked out well with the advent coal and oil heat.  Until the 1970′s or so, fuel was relatively cheap and plentiful, and burning it was relatively easy.  Efficiency and conservation do not seem to have been the watchwords of the day.  But times have changed, and now people seem to be mystified by why their radiators are placed where they are.  Some people want to fix the “mistake” of the original installer.  Here’s a project someone posted for making these diverters to channel hot air away from a cold window:You might ask, then– why not relocate the radiators away from the exterior walls altogether?  Why not move them to the walls closer to the center of the house?  You’d sacrifice something in evenness of heat, but gain quite a bit of efficiency.  Has anyone ever thought of this?

Well, of course they have.  If you’ve travelled in New England, you’ve probably seen 18th century houses in the “center chimney” style.  This design was the exact opposite of the radiators-under-windows scheme.  All the heat was produced in fireplaces clustered around the center of the house, which was the “warm zone”.  The areas close to the windows and exterior walls were probably frigid.  This is a schematic I drew to illustrate the difference in heating philosophy:And, here are some photos of an actual 1783 New Hampshire specimen in a real estate listing (to better appreciate the layout, or to buy the house, check out the “360° Tour” on the listing page)

In order to service fireplaces on several (possibly as many as four) sides, and on multiple floors, the central chimney might be truly massive.  Here’s a photo showing the enormous size of the chimney foundation in the cellar of such a house in Connecticut (from the website of an appreciative broker):Bruce Irving, in his recent book New England Icons, provides a short chapter all about the center-chimney design .  He writes, “As a heating plant, it was a terrific check to the long, severe New England winters.  A huge mass of bricks hosting multiple fireplaces and run through with flues carrying hot gases, it acted as a giant thermal mass, holding heat and radiating it outward from the core of the house.”  The main drawback, apparently, was not so much the cold at the periphery of the rooms, as the awkward floor plan and obstructed “flow” dictated by having a huge monolith in the center of your home.  According to Irving, improvements in fireplace performance eventually allowed the fireplaces to migrate to the ends of the house, freeing up the middle.  (Irving references Melville’s essay “I And My Chimney“, in which the writer wryly documents a war of attrition with his wife over the question of whether their house should be modernized by the removal of the center chimney.  I commend it to you for historical, if not literary, merit.)

So it seems that the move away from truly central central heating (to what I would call peripheral central heating) began as improved technology allowed for increased concessions to fashion and comfort.  It is easy to see how house-end fireplaces could transition into under-window radiators.  But now, as efficiency again becomes of interest, things might edge backwards.

Wood Heat Hot Water: Part I

November 12, 2011

At a wedding a few weeks ago I met a guy (husband of one of J.’s friends) who is building a system  to heat their domestic hot water via the wood stove.  His set-up involves running a steel water pipe right through the stove (he has welding skills– similar off-the-shelf versions are available, though).  A pump then circulates the water from the hot water tank, through the stove, and back.  A controller senses temperature differential and only turns the pump on when it’s needed.  (In summer, they use the same controller to run a solar system.)  I’ll ask his permission to post a few pictures here– it’s pretty cool.

I love this idea.  I’d like to build a similar system.  And I think I can & will.  But, my ideas sometimes don’t work out in practice– so my M.O., now, is to require on-site proof-of-concept at every stage that involves either (a) irreversible damage to something expensive, or (b) buying parts.  So, before even thinking about drilling holes in the wood stove (which I doubt I can ever bring myself to do), I want to test a version that just uses the stove top for heat exchange.   Step 1 was to estimate how much heat could, reasonably, be extracted from the top of the stove.  Step 1a was to guess:  the Luckily, because it’s almost Thanksgiving, it was easy to procure a cheap aluminum pan that almost exactly fits the stovetop.

A quick test revealed that water can easily be heated in the pan at a rate of about 2,200 BTU/hr, with the stove at medium-burn.  At that rate, it would take about 5 hours to heat 20 gallons of water from 50F to 120F.  That’s encouraging.  We don’t typically burn the stove 5 hours a day, of course.  But neither do we need to produce all of our hot water from wood heat– the idea would be just to make a big dent in it.  And in fact, I don’t really know how much hot water we use– it’s probably less than 20 gal/day.

The next test was to put a 10-foot coil of  1/2″ copper tubing on top of the stove, and run water through it for a while to see whether this would be suitably efficient as a heat exchanger.  Unfortunately, it was not nearly so good, capturing only 940 BTU/hr.  At that rate, we’d only manage to heat perhaps 5 gallons per day.  But, there is much room for improvement.  I have given a lot of though to means of increasing the heat conduction.  For example, the coil could just be set into a water bath in the aluminum pan.  Some heat would be lost to evaporation, but since the cool water in the coil would keep the water bath from ever exceeding about 120F, this would be minimal.  Another idea is to put the coil in the pan, then fill the pan with steel shot (or even, and my guru on this matter suggested, pennies).  What I’d really like to have is a slab of copper with the coil cast in the middle of it– but that is not a DIY project!  More tests to come, stay tuned.

Total project expenditure thus far:

Copper coil  $22.  Turkey pan $2.

Gadgetry

November 11, 2011

Here are a couple fun new toys at the Cold House.  Neither is really going to save much fuel, I think, but sometimes you buy toys just for… fun?

The first is a moisture meter (a Christmas gift from my brother & sister-in-law, which I just got around to putting to use.)  These are only about $35– not “contractor grade”, but very functional.  It’s pretty fun to just walk around the house measuring the moisture of this and that.  You know, see which cat is drier, etc.   Also it makes cool Star Trek-like beeps, with frequency proportionate to moisture level (so that even the blind can use it) (or you can use it in the dark?)   Anyway, the real point was to monitor the moisture of home-cured firewood, with the aim to “burn no wood before its time”.  If you buy “seasoned” firewood, this would also be very handy– you could confirm that the wood was dry before you accept delivery of it.  I’m pleased to report that the maple we felled spring of 2010 is now down around 13% moisture, and the wood that came down later last summer is about 16%. This is all good to go!  As you can see, my finger is not yet ready to burn.

Next, allow me to introduce you to the Toasty Tush.  This is, basically, a low-wattage heating pad that affixes under the lid of your toilet, and warms the seat when the lid is down (also warms your back, if you’re sitting on the seat.)  At $45, it’s far cheaper than toilet seats with built-in heaters.  Why would anyone need a heated toilet seat at all?  Well, I don’t really claim to understand this.  I am told that as a man, I never will.  But suffice to say, the cold toilet seat was the #1 complaint from others around the Cold House.  So, we’re trying it out.  Here it is in action:It has three settings; the middle one is about 20 watts (though it cycles on and off, so it might be more like 10-15W overall).  To further counter its electric usage, I plugged it in via my digital timer/thermostat:I have it set so it’s off overnight.  During the day, it turns on only if the bathroom temp drops below 60°F.  So far, we haven’t had a really good cold spell to give it a full test.  But it seems to work pretty well.  And if warming one square foot of the house lets you turn down the heat on all the rest, well, that’s a good plan.  Arguably, it will take forever to actually pay for itself, unless we start burning oil again.  But I figure it will use less than 5 cents of electricity per day, so it’s not going to break the bank, either.

“No One Smart Wants To Live in New England”

November 7, 2011

This little summary of the “plusses and minuses” of living in New England made me laugh.  Especially the part about “Eight months a year of icy hell, virtually entombing you in a pre-modern lifestyle of woodchopping and indoor-huddling.”  Ha ha ha!  No one chops wood for heat anymore!

Some of the rest of it is accurate, though.  I indeed have friends who regularly spot a black bear in their yard.  There is skiing (though perhaps that should be in quotes, I mean compared to Utah and Colorado).  There is indeed foliage and maple and apples.  It is not necessarily true, however, that you can easily buy maple syrup everywhere– many parts of the country strongly favor the imitation version (and try finding Grade B syrup in Florida or Arizona… what?  You’ve never had Grade B syrup?  You need to visit New England more often…)

Good Reading

November 5, 2011

Interested in that tiny little space where the Venn diagrams of home-heating, anthropology, cognitive science, and urban legend all intersect?  Well then, here’s some fascinating reading.

Meanwhile, you may wonder what we’ve been up to at the Cold House.   So far, since “fire up”, our kitchen temp has averaged 59F. That is 7 degrees above last year’s all-winter average… not clear yet where it will be heading.  We still have a little bit left of the 2 cords of wood we bought 2 years ago, but it’s now buried at the bottom of about a cord I split myself– sourced from our own yard, and trees that came down in friends’ yards.  So, this winter, I anticipate we will be burning 100% wood from within 4 miles of here, all “free” (my labor is, of course, worthless).

Coming soon will be posts on some exciting topics:

1)  New gadgets!  2)  A pending mass slaughter of Norway maples in the back yard!  Big time excitement.  3)  A scheme to heat our hot water, or part thereof, with the wood stove.  Stay tuned!

Breakfast By Wood

October 30, 2011

Lost power overnight due to the early-season snowstorm.  This morning had pancakes, oatmeal, and coffee over wood heat.  Almost a crisis, though, with whole-bean coffee and only an electric grinder… was about to resort to a mortar and pestle, but a one-day supply of ground coffee was located deep on a shelf somewhere…

Occupy Winter

October 28, 2011

Politics aside, I’m increasingly impressed with the “Occupy [City Name]” folks, just from a cold-living standpoint.  With snow coming tomorrow, we’re moving from  nice fall weather into winter-camping territory.  If they don’t pack it in, I’d say our local Maine branches (Portland, Augusta) will be contenders for the “coldest occupation site” (competition perhaps from Occupy Albany and Occupy Chicago… oh, and Alaska… oh and all those in Canada…)

Anyway, I have a pretty nice winter tent that hasn’t been out of its bag in, oh, at least 8 years.  Maybe I’ll stop by and donate it to the cause.

First Fire

October 26, 2011

Well, I guess it had to happen.  It got down to 56-point-something inside, and someone lit a fire.  Happy fire season.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 46 other followers